NOTE: If your manuscript is accepted for publication, JAMA Network`s video production staff may contact you to request an original uncompressed audio file in .wav or .aiff format. No maximum file size is required for publishing at this time. For cohort studies, the date of final follow-up should not be more than 5 years before the submission of the manuscript. Similarly, the data used in the case-control or cross-sectional studies should have been collected as late as possible, but no more than 5 years before the manuscript was submitted. Manuscripts in which the most recent data were collected more than 5 years ago generally have a lower publication priority; Therefore, the authors of these manuscripts should provide a detailed explanation of the relevance of the information in light of current knowledge and medical practice, as well as the last date of analysis of the study. Provide a citation in the text for each audio file. At the end of the manuscript, add a title (a short sentence, preferably no more than 10 to 15 words) and a caption that includes the file format and a brief explanation for each audio. Authors are strongly advised to ensure the right group of authors, the corresponding author and the order of the authors when submitting. Changes in authorship due to the addition or deletion of authors and/or changes made by the corresponding author and/or changes in the order of authors will not be accepted after acceptance of a manuscript.
Aggregated and anonymized demographic information (for example. B, age, gender, race/ethnicity and socio-economic indicators) should be reported for all research reports and systematic reviews as well as for all results given. All demographic variables assessed must be specified in the Methods section. Any demographic information collected must be published in the Results section either in the main article and/or in an online supplement. If demographic data that has been collected is not reported, this should be explained. Summary demographic information (e.B. Baseline characteristics of study participants) should be provided in the first line of the Results section of the abstract. Create tables that summarize the search results. Tables summarizing treatments should include information organized by category of treatment and then by individual treatment. Columns should include the name of the treatment, the strength of the evidence supporting the treatment, the effect of the treatment (preferably as an effect of the treatment versus the control of the outcome measured with 95 confidence intervals), side effects and, where appropriate, very brief comments. Long textual tables should be avoided. Additional or longer tables may only be published online in justified cases.
1. Cummings P, Rivara FP. Reports on statistical information in medical journal articles. Arch Pediatr Adolesc Med. 2003;157(4):321-324. doi:10.1001/archpedi.157.4.321 Files created by vector programs are best suited for accurately tracing and managing data points. JAMA logs are not able to use file formats native to statistical software applications to prepare numbers for publication. Most statistical software allows users to save or export files in digital vector formats. A structured summary is required and the trial registration information (record name, test ID, and URL) should be listed at the end of the abstract. For more information, see the instructions for preparing summaries for reports that contain original data.
A list of 3 key points is required (see Key Points Preparation Guide). Maximum length: 3000 words of text (without abstract, tables, illustrations, acknowledgements, references and additional documents) with a total of 5 tables and / or illustrations and no more than 50-75 references. The subtitle should include the phrase `A randomised clinical trial` or, for non-randomised controlled trials, `A non-randomised controlled trial`. For more information on clinical trials, see WADA`s Style Manual. Authors must not disclose the fact that their manuscript has been accepted to anyone, with the exception of co-authors and contributors, until it is published without the permission of the publisher or as described in the guidelines for the presentation of previous or planned meetings or for the publication of information and the embargo policy. For more information about sending numbers, see Numbers. Manuscripts that do not comply with these guidelines will not be considered. In the case of randomised clinical trial reports, authors should provide a data sharing statement indicating whether the data are shared or not. Specific questions about data exchange are included in the manuscript submission system. Whether authors choose to share data or not, this information will be published in a data sharing statement in an online supplement related to the published article. Authors are asked to identify the data, including individual patient data, a data dictionary that defines each field of the dataset, and the supporting documentation (e.B (e.g., statistical/analytical code) provided to the others.
when, where and how the data will be available (e.g. B a link to a data repository); the types of tests that are permitted; and whether there will be restrictions on the use of the data. Authors also have the opportunity to explain why data is not allowed to be shared. You are an interesting and well-known person, in this case an interesting and well-known neurologist stranded on a desert island. They have nothing to read but the Bible (or an equivalent) and the work of Shakespeare (or equivalent), a familiar script for those who listen to the BBC`s “Deert Island Discs” programme, which has been running for many decades. There is no internet access. To pass the time to the rescue, which neurology book and neurology journal would you like to have with you and why? Read and re-read, remember home and work? Answer this question in less than 200 words in an informative and educational way. Maximum 200 words Most of the essays published in On the Brain are personal vignettes (e.B. Exploring the dynamics of the patient-physician relationship), which stem from extensive experience in medicine; occasional articles express views and opinions on the myriad of issues affecting the profession.
.