The status of authorised economic operator granted in one Party shall be recognised by another Party without prejudice to customs controls, in particular with a view to the implementation of agreements with third countries on the mutual recognition of the status of authorised economic operator. Notwithstanding the preceding subparagraph, a Party may refuse to land fish from a fish stock of common interest on the management of which there are serious differences of opinion. The additional amounts of the financial contribution of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania for the period from 1 January 2007 to 30 April 2009 inclusive shall amount to EUR 21,5 million for the Republic of Bulgaria and EUR 50,5 million respectively. EUR for Romania; they shall be made available from the date of entry into force of the Agreement on the participation of the Republic of Bulgaria and Romania in the European Economic Area or of an Agreement for the provisional application of the Agreement and shall be committed in a single instalment for 2007. Where, under bilateral agreements between the Community and the various EFTA States, reduced customs duties exist for certain products, these duties shall be considered as basic duties for each of the EFTA States concerned. The Contracting Parties shall make every effort to reach agreement on matters relating to this Agreement. In particular, the EEA Joint Committee shall make every effort to find a mutually acceptable solution where a serious problem arises in an area which falls within the competence of the legislator of the EFTA States. Save as otherwise provided in this Agreement, and in particular Protocols Nos 41 and 43, the application of this Agreement shall prevail over the provisions of existing bilateral or multilateral agreements binding the European Economic Community, of the one part, and one or more EFTA States, of the other part, in so far as the same subject matter is governed by this Agreement. The provisions of the Agreements listed in Annex 3 shall prevail over the provisions of this Protocol in so far as they grant the EFTA States concerned more favourable trade arrangements than those provided for in this Protocol. Unlike EU Member States (where responsibility for trade policy is transferred to the European Commission), EEA-EFTA states are free to conclude their own trade agreements with other countries. Some of them are collectively negotiated by EFTA, which currently has 27 free trade agreements for 38 countries.
However, the EEA-EFTA States are also free to negotiate bilateral agreements without going through EFTA; For example, Iceland negotiated a free trade agreement with China, which entered into force on 1 July 2014. Officials of one Contracting Party may, in agreement with the other Contracting Party, be present during investigations in the territory of the other Contracting Party. Some have suggested that some sort of emergency brake could be read in the explicit derogations of the treaty. However, we are focusing on four other agreements that we believe are a safer model for emergency braking. the agreement in question is essential to the achievement of these outcomes and is no more restrictive than necessary for that purpose; and loans for the direct or indirect financing of an EC Member State or an EFTA State or its regional or local authorities may be granted or placed in other EC or EFTA Member States only if the States concerned have concluded an agreement on the matter. The extension of rights granted by parallel or equivalent agreements or arrangements or equivalent decisions between one of the Parties and third countries shall be recognised and respected by all Parties. Without prejudice to the specific provisions applicable in the Agreements between the European Economic Community and the EFTA States, this Protocol shall apply to controls and formalities relating to the carriage of goods which must cross a frontier between an EFTA State and the Community and between the EFTA States. This Protocol shall not supplement or impede the application of mutual assistance agreements which have been or may be concluded between the EC Member States and the EFTA States and between the EFTA States. Nor does it preclude more extensive mutual administrative assistance under such agreements. The Contracting Parties shall have the right to take decisions extending the legal protection of topographies of semiconductor products to persons originating in a third country or territory which is not a Party to this Agreement and who do not enjoy the right to protection provided for in this Agreement. You can also make the appropriate arrangements.
agreements or categories of agreements between undertakings; The conditions for such participation shall be the subject of an agreement between the Parties and the requesting State. This Agreement shall be submitted to all Contracting Parties for ratification or approval in accordance with their own procedures. Before concluding an agreement with a third country in the territory covered by this Chapter, the Parties shall consult each other in order to ensure compatibility with the provisions of this Chapter, in particular where this Agreement contains provisions derogating from the customs security measures referred to in this Chapter. Each Party shall ensure that agreements with third countries do not create rights and obligations for another Party, unless the EEA Joint Committee decides otherwise. Where the Kingdom of Norway exercises that right, the existing Agreements applicable to Spitsbergen may, in particular, the Agreement establishing the European Free Trade Association, the Free Trade Agreement between the European Economic Community and the Kingdom of Norway and the Free Trade Agreement between the Member States of the European Coal and Steel Community and the European Coal and Steel Community, on the one hand, and the Kingdom of Norway. on the other hand, it continues to apply to the territory of Spitsbergen. This freedom would have some advantages for the United Kingdom. Although it would lose its bargaining power from its current position as a member of the world`s largest trading bloc (the EU), it would be able to adapt its negotiating position to the interests of British businesses and consumers. However, continued participation in the single market would limit the UK`s freedom to conclude free trade agreements.
In terms of services, for example, the UK might ideally want to offer generous access to third countries in the hope of ensuring better access to its own service providers. However, there would still be a risk that the EU would impose new internal market rules in this area, which the UK (as an EEA EFTA state) would have to accept. This, in turn, would make it more difficult for the UK to make a firm commitment not to impose new restrictions on such services. the agreement is not such as to confer on the undertakings concerned the power to determine the prices of a substantial part of the products concerned in the territory covered by the agreement, or to control or restrict the production or marketing of a substantial part of the products concerned or to protect them from effective competition from other undertakings in the territory covered by the agreement. However, the competent authority referred to in Article 56 of the Agreement shall approve specialisation agreements or arrangements for the sale or joint sale of the products referred to in paragraph 1 if it finds that, in the cases provided for in international agreements concluded by a Party with a third country in the field of security, an entry or exit summary declaration: subject to Article 9b(3) of this Protocol. The Parties undertake to inform each other in the context of the work carried out within the framework of international organisations and intellectual property agreements. If no agreement can be reached on such rules or provisions, the Party concerned may take the necessary measures to prevent circumvention. Nevertheless, the history of the provision shows that the possible need for an emergency brake was an issue for many delegations, despite the fact that there was so little migration between 1957 and 2004 that any further discussion of an emergency brake on migration proved unnecessary. The world has changed since then. While the EU would continue to have freedom of movement, political realities suggest that change is needed. So we ask ourselves: is there a way to facilitate freedom of movement while addressing the political need to regain control of migration? We maintain that this exists and that the existing agreements show the way. In the event of disagreement between these two institutions on the measures to be taken in the context of a complaint or on the outcome of the examination, either of the bodies may refer the matter to the EEA Joint Committee, which shall examine it in accordance with Article 111.
.